Efficient transformer monitoring

Why trend analysis with MSENSE® DGA 2/3 is sufficient

Monitoring transformers and tap-changers is crucial for operational safety and early fault detection. While multi-gas DGA systems are often considered the most comprehensive solution, practical experience shows that continuous trend analysis with simple sensors such as the MSENSE® DGA 2/3 is not only sufficient but also significantly more cost-effective.

Oil testing is still very often carried out only once every one to two years in the laboratory – in between, the condition of the equipment remains largely unknown. Multi-gas sensors provide a detailed analysis of the entire gas spectrum, but they are expensive. And even when multi-gas sensors are used, a laboratory analysis is usually carried out to validate the results when the sensor issues a warning or alarm message. Online DGA systems such as the MSENSE® DGA 2/3, on the other hand, continuously provide trends for critical gases such as hydrogen (H₂) and carbon monoxide (CO), which are produced during thermal and electrical faults and when paper degradation begins.

This trend analysis enables early warning without the need for highly qualified personnel. In the case of MSENSE® DGA 2/3, three measurements (H₂, CO, humidity) are sufficient to monitor the condition and initiate targeted laboratory analyses in the event of anomalies. The repeatability of such sensors is 5–10%, which is often no worse than the repeatability of laboratory values.

Another advantage is that the total costs for single/dual gas sensors are significantly lower. According to CIGRÉ TB 783, switching from laboratory analyses to online trend analyses with simple sensors brings the greatest efficiency gains. This allows more equipment to be monitored simultaneously – with sufficient information and lower investment costs.

Costs/Benefits of Various DGA Monitoring Techniques

DGA Monitoring
Technique Used
Number of Avoided
Failures per Year
Avoided Costs
in M$ per Year
None None None
Laboratory DGA 2 7
Monitors M1, M2 4 13
Monitors M3 to M9 5(+0.8) 18(+24)

Table 1: CIGRÉ D1/A2 Technical Brochure TB 783, DGA monitoring systems, Chapter 2.7

The estimated total costs over the service life of an online DGA sensor also favor single/dual gas systems. They show a better ratio of total costs to investment costs.

DGA-System Invest1[€] Life cycle[Jahre] Costs/Year[€] Costs in 15 Years[€] Total costs[€] Ratio Total costs/Invest
MSENSE® DGA 2 ~5.500 15 275 4.125 9.625 1,75
MSENSE® DGA 3 ~6.800 15 340 5100 11.900 1,75
MSENSE® DGA 5 ~15.000 15 1125 16.875 31.875 2,125
MSENSE® DGA 9 ~26.000 15 1950 29.250 55.250 2,125

1depends on the configuration of the device

Estimation of the total lifetime costs of an online DGA sensor.

Costs per year:
MSENSE® DGA 2 5% of Invest
MSENSE® DGA 3 5% of Invest
MSENSE® DGA 5 7,5% of Invest
MSENSE® DGA 9 7,5% of Invest

Figure 1: Estimation of the total lifetime costs of an online DGA sensor

Recessed installation of MSENSE® DGA 2/3

The new option of recessed installation of the MSENSE® DGA 2/3 also makes it easier to retrofit existing systems. With a simple double screw connection, the sensor can be installed up to 20 cm outside the transformer tank – without the need for a ball valve with no loss of measurement quality.

  1. Transformer wall
  2. Gate valve (or other type of valve)
  3. Double screw connection
  4. MSENSE® DGA 2/3 and
  5. Oil convection in the transformer
[Translate to Spain:] Figure 2: Recessed installation of MSENSE® DGA 2/3
[Translate to Spain:] Figure 3: Double screw connection of the MSENSE® DGA 2/3

Conclusion

Trend analysis with the MSENSE® DGA 2/3 is a practical, cost-effective, and reliable solution for condition monitoring and early fault detection. It offers everything you need for effective monitoring—without the complexity and costs of a multi-gas system.

Results of two exciting case studies

400 kV single-phase GSU transformer, 267 MVA

400 kV single-phase GSU transformer, 267 MVA

Findings:

  • Increase in hydrogen concentration
  • An oil sample was taken. Laboratory analysis confirmed an increased hydrogen concentration and showed an increased acetylene concentration.
  • A partial discharge measurement indicated a fault on the high-voltage side of a bushing.

Investigation result: A potential connection on the high-voltage side of a bushing was defective.

Figure 4: Data recording online DGA sensor, H2 increase

380 kV single-phase GSU transformer, 600 MVA

380 kV single-phase GSU transformer, 600 MVA

Findings:

  • Continuous increase in hydrogen concentration and other hydrocarbon components.
  • Concentrations exceeded the limits for Condition 4 according to IEEE C57.104.
  • An oil sample was taken. Laboratory analysis results confirmed the trend.

Investigation results: There was mechanical contact between the core and the tank. This led to a ground fault. A hot spot developed, which caused a ground cable to melt.

Figure 5: Data recording online DGA sensor, H2 increase and increase of other hydrocarbons

Conclusion of the case studies

A comparable trend development and thus the same information content could have been achieved by monitoring the H2 content using a single/dual gas sensor alone – at significantly lower costs.

Get to know our sensors

Get in touch with the author

Dr. Jürgen Schübel

Teléfono +49 617 1639 8691
Correo electrónico J.Schuebel@reinhausen.com
QR

Escanee el código QR para guardar los datos de contacto como tarjeta de visita electrónica (TVE) en su teléfono smartphone